Stimulus: Good evening.
Response: It is a good evening, isn't it?
Now it is plain that this Response is, in fact, reciprocating a stimulus right back. I hereby illustrate this, color coding each speaker.
Stimulus: It is a good evening, isn't it?
Response: Yes, it is a good evening, and it was a beautiful day, also.
Response: Yes, it is a good evening, and it was a beautiful day, also.
Stimulus: Yes, it is a good evening, and it was a beautiful day, also.
Response: It was a good day, wasn't it?Stimulus: It was a good day, wasn't it?
Response: Indeed, and how good do you suppose it was?
Response: Indeed, and how good do you suppose it was?
Stimulus: Indeed, and how good do you suppose it was?
Response: Well, it exhibited cool and pleasant temperatures, and a grey, overcast sky.
Stimulus: Well, it exhibited cool and pleasant temperatures, and a grey, overcast sky.
Response: So what does this indicate about its goodness?
Response: So what does this indicate about its goodness?
Stimulus: So what does this indicate about its goodness?
Response: Nothing but that the day was stimulated to behave as it did.
Stimulus: Nothing but that the day was stimulated to behave as it did.
Response: Then why do you say the day was good?
Stimulus: Then why do you say the day was good?
Response: You stimulated me to say it.
Stimulus: You stimulated me to say it.
Response: I think I understand.
Stimulus: I think I understand.
Response: I do not see that you "understand."
Stimulus: I do not see that you "understand."
Response: How would you see that I understand?
Stimulus: How would you see that I understand?
Response: You would behave accordingly.
Stimulus: You would behave accordingly.
Response: How would I, understanding, behave?
Response: How would I, understanding, behave?
Stimulus: How would I, understanding behave?
Response: Do not "trouble" me with absurd questions about inner states.
Stimulus: Do not "trouble" me with absurd questions about inner states.
Response: I do not understand.
Response: I do not understand.
Stimulus: I do not understand.
Response: Exactly.
------------
Now behave.
3 comments:
We're on the behaviorism unit in my psychology class. I wasn't excited about the class to begin with, and reducing lives to conditioned responses to stimuli isn't improving my opinion.
Response:
I am inclined to think that psychology is generally nothing more than bad philosophy. Behaviorism, then, is bad philosophy based on evil philosophy: Benthamite utilitarianism.
Have fun with psychology, though, and perhaps be happy that I have just finished with behaviorism (for now.
I'm glad you're temporarily done with behaviorism. I hope it doesn't pop back up too frequently.
Post a Comment